While he had been involved in the religion debate for a long time prior to his publication, the issue of circumcision was of increasing importance to Christopher Hitchens (both as a moral issue and rhetorical strategy) towards the end of his life. We successfully tracked down two quotes in print (all from his best selling book God is Not Great) and one in digital form that comes courtesy of a debate with a Rabbi and a Priest which we’ll embed at the bottom. Needless to say, Hitchens' is against circumcision when done on an infant without consent. Stating that he believes that, if the child wants to be circumcised let them wait until they are of consenting age.
As to immoral practice, it is hard to imagine anything more grotesque than the mutilation of infant genitalia. Nor is it easy to imagine anything more incompatible with the argument from design.
In the above quote Christopher is making an argument that circumcision comes from religion but so does the argument from intelligent design. In a debate Hitchens once jested “what kind of argument from design is this? Babies are not born beautiful, they’re born ugly. They need to be sawn a bit at the genitalia.” In other words, if we’re truly made in the image of God, then why would God want us to continue with this practice. Now we’ll get to the below quote which comes three pages after the initial quote above.
Here Hitchens is arguing, similar to the above quote that the idea of circumcision would never befall humanity if not for religion.
“Full excision, originally ordered by god as the blood price for the promised future massacre of the Canaanites, is now exposed for what it is-a mutilation of a powerless infant with the aim of ruining its future sex life…if religion and its arrogance were not involved, no healthy society would permit this primitive amputation, or allow any surgery to be practiced on the genitalia without the full and informed consent of the person concerned.”
Now we get to the video exchange in question where Hitchens goes after Rabbi Kushner in the midst of what had been an amicable conversation up until this point.
Corrections Policy
Should we become aware that a thinker has changed their position, or if new evidence shows we have misconstrued their views, we will make the correction, note it here, and explain how we missed it. Report an error →